How to Calculate Beam Deflection for a Simply Supported Beam
The point-load deflection formula for a simply supported beam, what each variable actually controls, and two worked examples in steel and aluminum.
Published July 12, 2026
Beam deflection — how much a beam bends under load — is one of the most practically important calculations in structural engineering, since excessive deflection can cause real problems (cracked finishes, doors that won’t close, a floor that feels genuinely “bouncy”) well before a beam is anywhere near actually breaking.
The formula for a simply supported beam under a point load
For a simply supported beam (resting on two end supports, free to rotate at each) with a single point load applied at midspan, maximum deflection is: δ = (P × L³) / (48 × E × I), where P is the load, L is the span length, E is the material’s elastic modulus (a measure of stiffness), and I is the beam cross-section’s moment of inertia (a measure of how efficiently the cross-section resists bending).
δ = (P × L3) / (48 × E × I)
Deflection depends on load (P), span cubed (L³), material stiffness (E) and cross-section shape (I).
A worked example
A 1,000 N point load at the center of a 2-meter steel span, with E = 200 GPa (200,000,000,000 Pa, typical for structural steel) and I = 0.00000833 m⁴, gives a maximum deflection of about 0.1 mm — imperceptibly small, reflecting how stiff a properly-sized steel beam is under a modest load.
Compare that to a 2,000 N load on a longer 3-meter aluminum span, with E = 69 GPa (aluminum is considerably less stiff than steel) and I = 0.00001 m⁴: the deflection jumps to about 1.63 mm — over 16 times more, from a combination of a longer span, a heavier load, and a less stiff material all working in the same direction.
Why span length dominates the result
Look closely at the formula and one detail stands out: span length (L) is cubed, while load (P) is only linear. This means deflection is dramatically more sensitive to span length than to load — doubling the load doubles the deflection, but doubling the span length increases deflection by a factor of eight (2³). This cubic relationship is exactly why engineers pay disproportionate attention to span length when designing for stiffness, and why a genuinely modest-looking increase in how far a beam needs to reach unsupported can require a much stiffer, deeper, or stronger beam than a linear “a bit more span, a bit more strength needed” intuition would suggest.
What E and I actually control
Elastic modulus (E) is an intrinsic material property — steel’s is roughly 200 GPa, aluminum’s is roughly 69 GPa, and timber’s is roughly 11 GPa, meaning steel is inherently far stiffer than aluminum, which is itself far stiffer than wood, independent of the beam’s shape. Choosing a stiffer material is one lever for reducing deflection, but it’s often not the most practical one, since material choice is frequently constrained by cost, weight, or other design requirements.
The four factors work together in one direction:
Moment of inertia (I) depends entirely on the cross-section’s shape and size — not the material at all. A taller, deeper beam cross-section has a dramatically higher moment of inertia than a shallower one of the same material and area, because moment of inertia scales with the cube of a beam’s depth for most common cross-sections. This is exactly why floor joists and beams are almost always oriented with their long dimension vertical (standing “on edge”) rather than horizontal — a beam turned on its side, using the identical material and cross-sectional area, has dramatically less resistance to bending, simply because its effective depth in the bending direction is now much smaller.
Why deflection limits exist independent of strength limits
A beam can be structurally strong enough to safely carry a load — meaning it won’t break or permanently deform — while still deflecting more than is functionally acceptable. Building codes commonly specify separate deflection limits (often expressed as a fraction of span length, like L/360 for many floor applications) precisely because excessive deflection causes real, if non-catastrophic, problems: cracked drywall or plaster, doors and windows that bind, floors that feel noticeably springy underfoot, and over time, fatigue in finishes not designed to flex repeatedly. This is exactly why beam sizing in practice often ends up governed by a deflection limit rather than a pure strength limit — the beam needed to feel adequately stiff is frequently larger than the beam technically needed to avoid breaking.
Calculating it directly
The Beam Deflection Calculator on this site applies this exact point-load, simply-supported formula — enter your load, span, material stiffness and cross-section’s moment of inertia to get a direct deflection result in millimeters, useful for checking a design against a target deflection limit before finalizing it.
Related calculators
Beam Deflection Calculator
Find the maximum deflection of a simply supported beam under a center point load — one of the most common checks in structural and mechanical design.
Torque Calculator
Find torque from force and lever arm length — the rotational equivalent of force, and the basis for understanding leverage, gears, and rotating machinery.
Thermal Expansion Calculator
Find how much a material expands when heated, from its length and coefficient of thermal expansion — a key consideration for expansion joints in bridges, railways, and pipelines.